Curse

scythefromunder · Jun 01, 2008, 01:51 PM // 13:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by pumpkin pie

lol, i r actually still afraid of the hands under the bed. yes laugh at me, but its there i tell you. and the website also forgot the hand in the toilet bowl... yes those are there too.

I am quite scared of the one where the girl is watching tv, and the hands are popping out. The best way of not being scared is just dont think about them.

AscalonWarrior · Jun 01, 2008, 02:25 PM // 14:25

Those were amazing, I liked them. I think I'm a bit weird.

But the picture where the little girl walked down the stairs.. We have exactly same looking stairs going to our basement where our shower and sauna are.

The clown picture is kinda creepy also.

Tatile · Jun 01, 2008, 08:54 PM // 20:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiggles

felt sorry for the kid well baby with that tarantula on its stomach, gonna scar the baby for life :/

It could have been a realistic-looking fake spider, which was photoshopped. Besides, I don't think babies are all that aware of such things (I could be wrong, child psychology isn't my area).

Smarty · Jun 01, 2008, 09:11 PM // 21:11

lmao I got a nudge on MSN just as I scrolled down to the one with the zombie popping out of the ground. I nearly jumped out of my seat!

Good pics, there's a few there that remind me of my own childhood fears - and yeah I've not gotten over the hands under the bed yet either. :P

captainccc · Jun 02, 2008, 01:47 AM // 01:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrokian

Question.Was it the little girls face and connotation of horror on it or was it her strictly in her panties that made the pic?

Seriously why couldn't she have been in pjs like a typical kid?

Not going to start a"this is porn" war,but honestly.How come she couldn't have done the same pic in some sort of typical night time attire?

If she would have worn some,I don't know cinderella or some such kid thing pjs,would this have lessened the aspect of the picture?

In some pictures she does and it didn't seem to me the impact was lessened or greatened.

So why not just have her in pjs for all the pics?

Now the pics of the baby in diapers is not so bad.

But I don't feel the girl in her panties solely was a needed aspect.She could have easily shown the horror dressed.

After all isn't horror about feeling and not clothing?There was no need to show the girl in that manner.

Furthermore how come no boys in their underwear(DO NOT read anything into that.I am most certainly NOT REMOTELY like that)?Don't little boys scare as easily as little girls?Could you not have gotten the same "value" from a boy in his underwear as a girl?

Good pics overall.But sorry to disagree on the choice of attire on a few of them.While certainly not porn.They certainly could have been done different.

Its quite obvious to me why the little girl doesnt have a shirt on. She's obviously changing and looking over to the closet where her clothes are, scared to open it in search of a monster. Most people keep their clothes in the closet. When the little girl is looking for a new shirt, she looks towards the closet. Her childhood fear suggests that theres a monster in the closet so she's afraid to open it. Therefore she's standing there with no shirt on.

Happy?

They didnt use a little boy because they probably didnt have one BUT a little girl works better because thats a HUGE theme in contemporary and classic horror movies alike. She probably has that high pitched scream that all little girls do (just a stereotype, dont yell at me) that the artist wants the viewer to have in their head.

Divinitys Creature · Jun 02, 2008, 10:36 PM // 22:36

There are more terrifying fears to choose from. The pictures are scary in a way. I'm not a photographer but I think the images are too clean and there could be more texture and creepiness added to the pictures themselves.

Terrokian · Jun 02, 2008, 10:50 PM // 22:50

I think most kids of that age have pretty much the same high pitched squeal.

Issac · Jun 02, 2008, 11:05 PM // 23:05

Man, that stuff was pretty creepy lol.

Miss Puddles · Jun 05, 2008, 06:29 PM // 18:29

clownphobia. for serious. *shudder*

i lol'ed at the one where the little girl and the dead lady are screaming at each other XD

overall, very nice art though.

Malice Black · Jun 05, 2008, 06:39 PM // 18:39

I see the kiddie porn discussion got dragged here too. I slept in just my underwear as a child, as did many others I expect.

Those images are really good though.

Turtle222 · Jun 05, 2008, 07:07 PM // 19:07

Strange...my childhood fear was the dark. It was merely the shadows that scared the living hell out of me. There is hardly any darkness present in these pictures.

Tatile · Jun 06, 2008, 06:49 AM // 06:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malice Black

I see the kiddie porn discussion got dragged here too. I slept in just my underwear as a child, as did many others I expect.

Those images are really good though.

Where there are young children there will always be the reactionary, without fail. It's just what they are yelling about that changes.

AscalonWarrior · Jun 06, 2008, 07:31 AM // 07:31

I slept in my underwear too, when I was a child, and I still do. I don't see any porn in those pictures, just children in underwear.

Maria The Princess · Jun 06, 2008, 06:53 PM // 18:53

for some reason i have a feeling that the author was a victim of a pedophile in the childhood, or is really scared of that happening to their child.

the monster under the bad picture, has Daddy No spelled with the letter cubes on the floor.

the picture with the fridge at night, has a "monster" behind the door, but the monsters lower body looks alot like a mans lower body.

in the picture that is the monster in the cloet, the girl is naked and posing

and in the end, of course the wolf with the human hand